Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee based on his or her race, religion, national origin, gender or color. It covers all types of employment decisions including job transfers, promotions, disciplinary actions, training or other job-related issues. However, there is no
... continue reading
In Idaho, and in most states of the U.S., a worker is entitled to receive his or her pay on the designated payday through guidelines of the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor. This agency is also responsible for policies dealing with minimum wage.
... continue reading
The federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 provides that in Alabama, as well as the other states, employers must not decline to pay their workers on payday. Companies are allowed to decide which day of the week, or the frequency of the pay period. However, after that
... continue reading
An employer in Ohio declines to hire a man he knows is gay. This decision would be legal because there is no federal law that prohibits hiring someone based on sexual orientation. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discriminating against someone based on race, religion, color,
... continue reading
In 1964, a federal law was passed to protect workers from discrimination on a wide-ranging basis. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically addressed race, sex, national origin, color, and religion. However, it does not address sexual orientation. For that reason, employment discrimination based on sexual orientation
... continue reading
In Wyoming there is no law, either federal or state, that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. This may change in the near future.
The US House recently passed the ENDA, a bill that would make discrimination based on sexual orientation a federal offense and offer
... continue reading
Federal law governs the administration of pre-employment polygraph exams in Oklahoma. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division enforces the federal regulations for the use of lie detector tests in the workplace. In general, private employers are not allowed to require prospective or existing employees
... continue reading
There is no federal law that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation in South Carolina . Other states have enacted laws to provide this protection since federal law does not outlaw such practices. New Jersey has the Law Against Discrimination which prohibits any employment decision based on sexual orientation.
... continue reading
Many employees have questions regarding light duty in Mississippi .
While many Mississippi employers offer alternate assignments to workers on a light duty restriction, there is no law requiring the employer to pay the worker, if no work exists.
Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in the workplace began with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Discrimination based upon a wide range of factors is specifically addressed in the act. This includes discrimination based on religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Other federal have further outlined the national prohibition
... continue reading
Employees in Kentucky could be subjected to a pre-employment polygraph test if they are applying for a government position or for a job, which carries special security concerns.
However, most Kentucky employers are prohibited from using polygraphs for pre-employment screening under federal law.
Workers in Nevada frequently question certain practices by employers. Can employers legally set minimum weight and height standards as requirements for specific jobs? Generally speaking, the answer to this question is no. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits such discrimination.
A recent case in New Mexico involved an employee named Jessica. Jessica is a disabled employee, and complained to her boss that she was being harassed about her hearing and speech problems. In such situations, employers always need to take such claims seriously, and make sure that they put an
... continue reading
The year 1964 saw the creation of a law that offered protection against discrimination for employees in Massachusetts, as well as in all other states of this country. This is known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Discriminatory acts within the workplace that are based on someone’s national
... continue reading
Some employees in Florida have questions regarding a recent discrimination case in Texas. In this workplace situation, a disabled worker was being harassed about her hearing and speech difficulties. The worker filed a complaint stating that she was being subjected to a hostile work environment each day because of the
... continue reading
In Arkansas, quite a few employees have questions regarding whether employers can establish height and weight minimum requirements for particular jobs. Legally, most employers cannot do this.
In 1964, an act was created making it illegal for employers to discriminate against people based on their color, national origin, sex,
... continue reading
In the state of Alaska, if an employer creates minimum weight or height standards for certain jobs, it is usually illegal discrimination. Many workers have had questions about this issue. Employers would have to prove that they truly needed such specific requirements in order for it to be considered legal
... continue reading
A hostile work environment was recently created in Mississippi in an all too common situation. Gary, a disabled employee, began complaining that he was being subjected to taunts and hurtful comments about his speech and hearing problems. Any time such a situation arises, employers should take immediate actions to put
... continue reading
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers in Indiana, as well as other states throughout the country. A question that comes up quite frequently among employees is, can employers set minimum height requirements for any job? Although there may be extenuating circumstances in some instances, the
... continue reading
In the state of Delaware, if an employer creates minimum weight or height standards for certain jobs, it is usually illegal discrimination. Many workers have had questions about this issue. Employers would have to prove that they truly needed such specific requirements in order for it to be considered legal
... continue reading
In the state of Michigan, many employees question whether pre-employment polygraphs are legal.
The state does not have its own polygraph law in regards to employment. Instead, it follows the federal model. In most cases, private employers are not allowed to give lie detector tests for pre-employment screening, or
... continue reading
There are lots of employees in Oregon who wonder if pre-employment polygraphs are legal.
First, it is important to mention that Oregon does not have a separate polygraph law for employment. Instead, it follows the federal model. Most private employers are prohibited from administering lie detector tests for pre-employment
... continue reading
Illinois employees frequently wonder if pre-employment polygraphs are legal in their state.
Even though Illinois does not have its own polygraph law for employment, the state does follow the federal model. According to the federal Employee Polygraph Protection Act, most private employers are prohibited from giving lie detector tests
... continue reading
Some workers in Iowa have wondered if pre-employment polygraphs are legal in that state.
Though the state does not have its own polygraph law in regards to employment, it does follow the federal model. Under the federal Employee Polygraph Protection Act, the majority of private employers are prohibited from
... continue reading
The state of Arkansas has numerous employees who wonder if pre-employment polygraphs are legal.
To begin, Arkansas does not have a separate polygraph law for employment. Arkansas follows the federal model, known as the federal Employee Polygraph Protection Act. This act prohibits the majority of private employers from giving
... continue reading
Human Resources professionals consider it a bad practice. The federal government protects its own civilian employees from it. Many companies have developed policies prohibiting it.
“It” is discrimination in hiring and the workplace due to sexual orientation.
Despite these policies, however, no Utah or federal law currently makes
... continue reading
Neither federal nor South Dakota law makes it illegal to discriminate in employment or in the workplace based on sexual orientation.
Even the foundational legislation known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it against the law to discriminate on the basis of many
... continue reading
Many companies have developed their own policies prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. The federal government protects its civilian employees from such discrimination. Nonprofit agencies and private firms that have federal contracts must not discriminate against gays, lesbians, and transgendered workers.
Yet neither Kentucky nor federal law prohibits discrimination
... continue reading
No federal or Virginia law right now forbids job discrimination against gay, lesbian, or transgendered workers.
This unfortunate state of events could change in the not too distant future. And there are some restrictions on discrimination against federal government workers because of sexual orientation.
Gay, lesbian, and transgendered workers cannot depend upon federal or Georgia law to protect them from discrimination on the job and in hiring. A major piece of federal civil rights legislation known as Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. And while some states have filled the
... continue reading